AnLove, Context, and Affirmation
Introduction
Few topics have stirred as much debate within Christian communities as the question of homosexuality. For many LGBTQ+ individuals, faith can feel like a battlefield — one where they are forced to choose between their identity and their spirituality. But must it be that way? Can a faithful reading of the Bible support and affirm same-sex love?
The short answer is: yes. When Scripture is read in its cultural context, with an understanding of original language, historical setting, and the overarching message of the Gospel, it becomes clear that the Bible does not condemn loving, consensual same-sex relationships. Instead, it champions love, justice, and dignity for all people.
The Gospel’s Foundation: Love and Inclusion
When Jesus was asked what matters most in the law, He replied:
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind… and love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matthew 22:36–40)
That message doesn’t change based on someone’s orientation. If the heart of Christianity is love, then the lens through which we read Scripture must also be one of love, not exclusion.
Understanding the “Clobber Passages”
There are only a handful of Bible verses often cited to condemn homosexuality. These are sometimes called the “clobber passages.” Let’s examine each one and explore alternative interpretations rooted in context and scholarship.
1. Genesis 19 – Sodom and Gomorrah
The Claim: God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because of homosexual behavior.
The Context: The men of Sodom attempt to gang-rape visiting strangers (Genesis 19:5). This is not about love or sexuality — it’s about violence, humiliation, and abuse of power, which were common tools of domination in ancient warfare and society.
Alternative Interpretation: The prophet Ezekiel clarifies Sodom’s true sin:
“Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.” (Ezekiel 16:49)
The story of Sodom is about inhospitality, cruelty, and injustice, not consensual same-sex relationships.
2. Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 – The Holiness Code
“Do not lie with a man as with a woman; that is an abomination.” (Leviticus 18:22)
The Claim: These verses prohibit all homosexual acts.
The Context: Leviticus is part of the ancient Holiness Code, a set of ritual laws for the Israelites, including bans on eating shellfish, mixing fabrics, and planting two seeds in the same field. These laws were about cultural identity and purity, not universal morality.
The Word “Abomination”: The Hebrew word to’ebah often refers to ritual impurity, not moral evil. It was also used to describe dietary laws (Deuteronomy 14:3). Christians today do not follow most of the Levitical code — and even Jesus stated that it’s not what goes into a person that makes them unclean, but what comes from the heart (Mark 7:15).
3. Romans 1:26–27 – Paul’s Letter to the Romans
“…their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another…”
The Claim: Paul condemns homosexuality outright.
The Context: Paul is describing idol worship and lustful excess, not loving same-sex relationships. The phrase “natural relations” must be understood culturally — Paul used it to describe expected behavior in his time, not a universal blueprint. He was condemning people acting against their own nature (e.g., heterosexual people engaging in acts contrary to their orientation).
Additionally, Paul lived in a Greco-Roman world where exploitative sexual practices (like pederasty or temple prostitution) were common. There is no mention here of mutual, loving same-sex partnerships — only lustful excess tied to idolatry.
4. 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 and 1 Timothy 1:9–10
These verses include the Greek terms malakoi and arsenokoitai, which are notoriously difficult to translate.
The Claim: These passages condemn homosexuals.
The Language: Malakoi literally means “soft” and was often used to describe effeminacy, luxury, or moral weakness. It was not a term for sexual orientation.
Arsenokoitai is a rare, ambiguous term. It appears to be a combination of the Greek words for “male” (arsen) and “bed” (koite), possibly referencing exploitative acts. It does not appear anywhere in Greek literature before Paul, and its precise meaning remains debated.
Modern scholarly consensus increasingly recognizes that these terms likely referred to exploitative sexual practices, not consensual, loving same-sex relationships.
Affirming Scriptures Often Overlooked
While many focus on prohibitions, they overlook the inclusive themes that permeate Scripture:
1. Ruth and Naomi (Ruth 1:16–17)
“Where you go, I will go… your people will be my people, and your God my God.”
Though traditionally seen as platonic, Ruth and Naomi’s bond has long been celebrated as a model of covenantal love. Some scholars view this deep devotion as potentially romantic in nature.
2. David and Jonathan (1 Samuel 18–20)
“Your love to me was more wonderful than the love of women.” (2 Samuel 1:26)
David and Jonathan’s relationship is marked by deep emotional and spiritual intimacy. While not definitively romantic, their bond challenges assumptions about masculinity, affection, and relational boundaries.
3. Galatians 3:28 – All Are One in Christ
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”
Paul’s vision for the church is one of radical inclusion — where worldly divisions dissolve in light of God’s love. This spirit of unity leaves no room for exclusion based on sexual orientation.
Jesus and LGBTQ+ People
While Jesus never spoke about homosexuality, He constantly stood with the marginalized, broke social taboos, and challenged the religious elite. If a gay man or a lesbian woman approached Him, would He condemn them — or say, “Your faith has made you well”?
His mission was clear:
“I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” (John 10:10)
That includes LGBTQ+ people — created in God’s image, beloved, and called to live in truth.
Conclusion: The God Who Affirms
The Bible, when read in context, does not condemn LGBTQ+ people. Instead, it offers a story of God’s radical love, a Savior who invites all to the table, and a Gospel that affirms the dignity of every person.
To LGBTQ+ readers:
You are not an abomination;
You are not broken;
You are fearfully and wonderfully made (Psalm 139:14);
You are beloved. And you are welcome.
Resources for Further Study
God and the Gay Christian by Matthew Vines (Affiliate Link)
Unclobber: Rethinking Our Misuse of the Bible on Homosexuality by Colby Martin (Affiliate Link)
The Queer Bible Commentary edited by Deryn Guest et al. (Affiliate Link)
Return to Theology