What we understand so far
The term “dark matter” refers to some form of mass (or mass-effect) in the universe that does not emit or absorb light (or more precisely, electromagnetic radiation) in any significant amount, hence “dark.” College of LSA. Wikipedia
The evidence for it is strong. For instance: galaxies rotate in such a way that, unless there is extra unseen mass, stars at the outskirts should fly off—but they don’t. Sky at Night Magazine
Colliding galaxy-clusters such as the famous Bullet Cluster show that most of the mass doesn’t behave like normal gas: in the collision the hot gas slows, but the gravitational mass (inferred via lensing) doesn’t follow the gas, pointing to a non-interacting mass component. Center for Astrophysics
In cosmological models (the standard “ΛCDM” model) dark matter makes up roughly ~27% of the universe’s energy-mass budget (ordinary, visible matter ~5 %, dark energy ~68%). Center for Astrophysics
The leading candidate explanations are particles beyond the Standard Model of particle physics (for example Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, WIMPs; axions) or other exotic forms (extra dimensions, primordial black holes) or modifications of gravity. Sky at Night Magazine
Dark Energy
Dark energy is the name given to whatever is driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. In 1998 two independent teams found that distant Type Ia supernovae were fainter than expected, implying the expansion of the universe is speeding up. Center for Astrophysics
It acts (in the simplest model) like a form of energy inherent to space itself—a cosmological constant (Λ) in Einstein’s equations—giving rise to a negative pressure that drives the expansion. A&A Publishing
In current cosmic energy “budget” terms, dark energy makes up ~68% of the universe, dominating the large-scale fate of the cosmos. Center for Astrophysics
What we still don’t know (and why it matters)
This is where things get juicy. There are more unknowns than knowns. As a writer, this is exactly where the imagination strays into wonder. But in science, it’s where new discoveries await.
1. What is dark matter (fundamental identity)
We don’t know for sure what particle or entity dark matter is. Is it a WIMP? An axion? A sterile neutrino? A primordial black hole? Or something else entirely? Wikipedia
Despite many decades of searching, direct detection of dark-matter particles (i.e., seeing them interact non-gravitationally) has not happened (or at least nothing definitive). CERN
There are puzzles in the small-scale structure of galaxies: e.g., the “core-cusp problem” (observed dark-matter density profiles in dwarf galaxies are shallower than predicted) and the “too-big-to-fail” and “missing satellites” problems. Wikipedia
Some new theories propose “self-interacting dark matter” (SIDM) — a dark matter type that interacts with itself but not (much) with ordinary matter. This could help with some of the small-scale structure issues. UCR News
And still: what if dark matter isn’t a particle at all but a breakdown of our gravity theories at large scales? Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) or emergent gravity proposals challenge the usual interpretation. Sky at Night Magazine
Why this matters: The identity of dark matter is crucial not just for cosmology, but for particle physics (what lies beyond the Standard Model), for galaxy formation (how structure emerges), and maybe for new physics entirely. If you’re writing fiction in a speculative-cosmic vein, the fact that 85 % of matter is unseen is an invitation.
2. What is dark energy, and is it constant?
Is dark energy simply the cosmological constant (Λ) — a fixed energy density of empty space? Or is it something more dynamic (e.g., quintessence, evolving scalar field) with changing strength over time? Wikipedia
Recent observations hint that dark energy might weaken or evolve over time: e.g., new surveys suggest that the strength of dark energy may not be truly constant. Reuters AP News
What drives dark energy? Why the observed magnitude? There’s a “why so small but not zero?” problem: theoretical predictions of vacuum energy yield absurdly large numbers, but observations show a small but nonzero value.
Are dark energy and dark matter connected? Some theories propose coupling or interaction between them (the “dark sector”). If yes, what form does that interaction take, and why is it tuned the way it is? arXiv
Why this matters: The nature of dark energy determines the fate of the universe: will expansion continue accelerating forever (leading to a “Big Freeze” or “Big Rip”), slow down, reverse, or modify in unknown ways? As we refine our measurements, we might uncover entirely new physics. For a speculative-fiction writer, the “wind of expansion” becomes a storyline: a meta-force, a cosmic tide, maybe even a character.
3. Why the numbers work out the way they do (“coincidence” problem)
It’s curious that we live at a time when dark energy, dark matter, and ordinary matter are of comparable magnitude (on the scale of energy‐density parameters) even though they evolve differently over time. Why now? This “cosmic coincidence” is puzzling. Wikipedia
Why do the observed proportions (~5 % ordinary matter, ~27 % dark matter, ~68 % dark energy) work out so neatly in the standard model? Any shift would change the structure formation history drastically.
4. How do dark matter and dark energy influence structure formation and evolution?
We know dark matter acts as the scaffolding for galaxy formation: it clumps, forms halos, ordinary matter falls in. But exactly how dark matter behaved in the early universe, how it clustered at very small scales, how it interacted (if at all) with itself or other fields is still uncertain.
For dark energy: measurements of the growth of structure (galaxy clusters, cosmic web) show some tension with the predictions of the simplest ΛCDM model. For example, a recent study found that the growth of cosmic structure is suppressed more than predicted, suggesting new dark-sector physics or modified gravity. College of LSA
5. Could our assumptions about gravity be wrong?
One radical possibility: perhaps what we call dark matter or dark energy is really a sign that our laws of gravity (e.g., General Relativity) break down on cosmological scales. If so, the “dark” components are mirages. SingularityHub
For example, modifications to Newtonian dynamics (MOND) or emergent gravity frameworks. While these have trouble explaining all data, they remain in the conversation. Sky at Night Magazine
6. What is the ultimate fate of the universe?
If dark energy is constant and dominates forever, the universe will keep expanding, galaxies will recede, stars will burn out, and we approach a “heat-death”/“big freeze”.
If dark energy grows stronger (“phantom energy”), it could lead to a “Big Rip” where even atoms are torn apart.
If it weakens or reverses, perhaps expansion might slow or reverse leading to a “Big Crunch” or bounce. Recent observational hints of weakening dark energy (see above) make this more than mere speculation. The Guardian
Support Me On Patreon
Return to Science